What is charisma?
Charisma is a magnificent property of hypnotizing and others. According to the prevailing wisdom in society, charisma is a divine gift that some people possess, by which they will not be classified as ordinary people, but will be treated as superhuman or as extraordinary men. Charismatic leadership is heterogeneous, it can be political, business, religious. Charisma belongs to a person’s personality. In simple charisma is personal magnetism. Charisma is why people look up to some leaders, such as Americans who follow Mr. Richard M. Nixon, even after his involvement in the Watergate scandal. Charisma does not always show a positive impact; It has its own negative aspects. The largest corporate fraud in India was led by Mr. Ramalinga Raju, one of the most effective and charismatic leaders who led the Satyam group of companies to become one of the leading IT solutions companies in India.
Is charisma inherent or acquired?
Against the prevailing wisdom that prevails in society, charisma can be acquired by any individual. Charisma is often considered a trait. Trait is the inner character of a human being like knowledge, energy, etc. Traits like knowledge are not innate, they are acquired, but charisma is an exceptional trait. Charisma is innate in each one but in different amounts. Some leaders like JFK, Bill Clinton are born with miraculous charisma and are considered gifted. The parameters for charisma are communication skills, risk taking, authenticity, etc. All of these characters can be developed by one person, which in turn improves a person’s charisma. According to the attribution theory, charisma depends on people’s perception. A person is charismatic if and only if people feel that he is charismatic. Steve Jobs was controversial for some people, but for some he is charismatic, he shows that the charisma of an individual will depend on the environment in which he finds himself. If the people needed a character and the leader possesses that character, then he is considered charismatic. There are many cases where a person who was rejected by the people at some later point in time proved to be charismatic, as was the case with Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Regan. Some individuals will emerge as charismatic leaders after great speeches like ‘I have a dream…’ by Martin Lutur King. So charisma can be acquired by an individual. Muthandar al Zeidi, the journalist who threw a shoe at the US head of state, became charismatic in Iraq. He happened overnight, but the burning thoughts of him never forget the night. The years of Iraqi bloodshed made him take the lead and made everyone follow him, admire him. to the
Is charisma mandatory to be an effective leader?
Charisma is not required to be an effective leader. Creativity, innovation, anything can propel a leader to effectiveness. If you can innovate something like Facebook, Microsoft, or Google, you’ll come across as an effective leader regardless of your charisma levels.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin of Stanford University were significantly low in charisma, but they efficiently led hundreds of employees and made Google a multibillion-dollar business. This example justifies that charisma is not mandatory to be an effective leader. Charisma is just an extra boost for a normal leader to become extraordinary. Even without charisma, a leader can make you an effective leader if he has other leadership qualities at an extraordinary level, as in the case of Jerry, the former CEO of Yahoo. Mr. Yang Jerry has a great vision, but still no charisma, he made his way to success.
The space for charisma depends on the field: in religion and politics, charisma has a role to play, not in business. If you can show that your ideas are compelling, you can be an effective leader.
Transformational and charismatic leadership-
Yes, both charismatic leadership and transformational leadership have similarities, as the transformational leader may well be charismatic. Charismatic leadership is part of transformational leadership because for a leader to inspire his subordinates to work beyond his own interests, he must have charisma. The ultimate goal of both leaderships is to inspire employees beyond what they can do. Both leadership concepts are mostly the same, but the charismatic leader, who is a personal vision, inspires the employees, while the transformational leaders make the employees aware of their goals and inspire them. Transformational leaders have a basic focus on transforming the organization and, quite possibly, their followers, the charismatic leader, do not want to change anything. Transformational leaders are mostly charismatic like Abraham Lincoln. If they have good intentions towards others, they can go higher and transform an entire company. The charismatic leader gathers followers by force of character and magnetism, rather than any form of outside power or influence.
Transformational leaders encourage their subordinates to work for the good of the organization rather than for their own personal gain. Charismatic leadership is also about creating a one-of-a-kind identity from the group that is very separate from the other group. Leaders make a separate image of the group in the minds of supporters, so that supporters can simply recognize themselves with the group, which in turn gives supporters a sense of belonging. The charismatic leader has fantastic self-confidence; They always lead by example, are patient and show great willpower. Transformational leaders raise subordinates’ awareness of the importance of their everyday jobs and the importance of performing them well. Transformational leaders create subordinates aware of their requirements for expansion, development, and individual achievement. They have a mental image of how well things could be in an administration that contrasts with how things are today. Charismatic leaders certainly communicate this vision to their followers and, through their own passion and stimulation, induce their followers to passionately support their vision. Charismatic leaders tend to contain a high degree of self-confidence and self-esteem, which further encourages followers to respect and admire them. The initial attempt of charismatic leaders is to understand the background in which they are doing their work. They attach great importance to people’s moods and feelings and try to connect with them personally.
All transformational leaders are charismatic, but not all charismatic leaders are transformational, for example, Sam Walton and Abraham Lincoln are both transformational leaders and charismatics. Jim Jones, who is famous for his charisma, but never transformational, so go for it.
Jose Bizo Tito.
Why flexibility?
In our rapidly changing world, technology is advancing faster than we can keep track of it as virtually every business goes global, and especially as climate change threatens our people. In the especially near future, organizations will be looking for managers who have the skills of sustainable management. It is mandatory for an effective leader to be flexible. The way the change in trend suggests us to have a
manager flexible to their nature of work and characteristics corresponding to that work.
Flexible and effective leadership
The general qualities of the excellent leader are their ability to flex, modify and adapt their style according to the situation, context and circumstances in which they live. Effective leaders have their own decisions and will be able to act differently, think differently, and seek inspiration from different sources. These are all good qualities of flexible leadership and a flexible leader must make his own decisions without the help of others, adjustable to any situation. The motivation of the leader is to prepare himself to respond to a large distribution of positions, jobs Whenever the leader is curious about which leadership style is the best and wants to show his good qualities and wants to become the role model for others. He clearly and effectively delegates to team members. Leaders at all levels need to develop the ability to figure out exactly what challenge to focus on at any given moment and how best to respond to it. Even for the same leadership, manners and formal programs will change as conditions change. Common sense alone should assure us that bringing in one position may be less effective in a different position, or when conditions change for the reason leaders at all stages motivate generating the power to figure out what challenge to face at a moment’s notice. given. and the best way to react to the same leadership challenge, the rough mix of leadership activity and formal plans will alter as the conditioned reaction changes.
Situational leadership is often taken as the flexible one, where a manager needs to work in different types of situations where he cannot predict the outcome. The need for such people has increased tremendously in the recent past, as the globalized economy needs people who have those skills set to fit into all kinds of roles. An effective leader is one who understands the group, the goal to be achieved and how to achieve it. In general, an effective manager is task-oriented, but sometimes the way he manages teams makes them flexible to work in the type of work environment.
According to contingency theory, no management principle is valid for all situations. The effective leader will have many leadership styles and use them according to the situation.