The attacks on the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021 have emphasized the need for voters to be vigilant in electing only politicians with the highest integrity. Our Founders designed the Constitution to help ensure that political candidates were men of integrity and declared that those politicians should only stay in office if they displayed good behavior. Members of Congress in both the US Senate and House of Representatives have been fomenting lies and instigating voters to act illegally. Our individual ability to require our representatives in Congress to remain ethical is limited.

When the Founders were drafting the Constitution, they were primarily concerned with forming a government that would last. They were wrong when they formed US Constitution Art. i, sec. 6, class 1, known as the Speech or Debate clause, (1) granting immunity to members of Congress for their conduct during session. The United States Supreme Court has held that Congress is immune from civil lawsuits and some crimes. Although the Founders did not grant Congress immunity from committing crimes of disorderly conduct, felony crimes, or treason, the US Supreme Court has severely limited the ability of prosecutors to bring criminal charges against members of Congress. This protection from civil and criminal penalties causes members of Congress to act inappropriately. On our own, we have little legal recourse to persuade our representatives to comply with legal and ethical standards.

The Constitution gives each house of Congress the power to make rules and discipline other members, but you rarely see or hear of Congress expelling a member of Congress for misconduct. Partisan loyalties and other considerations create an atmosphere in which ethical standards are not followed or enforced. As a result of the limited checks and balances for members of Congress, they become less ethical each year. If state political parties became more organized, they would have the ability to band together to persuade members of Congress to abide by the law and ethical standards.

Political parties in all states should encourage their members to formally join the state political party, which will unite large voting blocs that may have the power of a lobbyist. Each member’s contact information can be used to send a monthly message to your party trying to send consistent messages to your representative about what you want them to support. A message to your Senator or State Representative that says: “We have 2,000,000 voters willing to vote for a politician who will enforce ethical standards by impeaching US Senator _____ for inciting violence..” A large, united political party that actively seeks the ethical standards of our politicians will get results. People generally don’t like to be bothered too much, so it will only work if the party’s messages are limited to once per month, 12 per year.

On July 3, 1980, Congress enacted the “Code of Ethics for Government Service.” (2) It has ten ethical standards such as putting country before political party and other admirable requirements. However, a United States prosecutor issued a legal opinion in court, holding that this law could not be applied in a civil or criminal context. That lawyer eviscerated those ethical standards that have no way of being applied. I think I read that this United States Attorney who wrote that legal opinion was unanimously nominated as a judge by Congress. Congress also rarely upholds the law or ethical standards for members of the Executive who commit perjury or adequately ensure that the Court upholds the Constitution. The blame for the attacks on the US Capitol falls on the American people because we are not actively involved enough to make good changes in our government. The digital age with ultra-fast communications and press releases from political parties seeking organization and party unification gives us the ability to stand together to ensure that our government does not further embarrass us and our nation.

(1) Todd Garvey, (December 1, 2017), “Understanding the Speech or Debate Clause,” Congressional Research Service (CRS). Federation of American Scientists (FAS). R45043. [p. 6]. Publicly available at

(2) LII Staff, (1980), “Annex to Part 73 – Code of Ethics for Public Functions” LII/Institute of Legal Information. Cornell Law School. Publicly available at

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *